Tag: litigation

litigation

J&J Settlement Restricts Marketing Distribution of Journal Article Reprints

Sept. 10, 2012 – A recent settlement between Johnson & Johnson/Janssen and multiple states to resolve claims that the company promoted unapproved uses for its antipsychotic drugs Risperdal and Invega is significant not only because J&J will pay $181 million but also because, among several provisions, the settlement restricts J&J’s ability to distribute reprints of […]

Read more

PhRMA Files Amicus Brief to Support Harkonen Fraud Conviction Appeal

Nov. 22, 2011 – Stating that “a robust dialogue” between pharmaceutical companies and the public “would be seriously chilled” if the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upholds the 2009 criminal conviction of former InterMune CEO W. Scott Harkonen for allegedly making false statements about Actimmune in a press release, the Pharmaceutical Research […]

Read more

RPM Report: Pandora’s Box Officially Open as New Legal Challenges to FDA’s Off-label Restrictions Emerge

Oct. 24, 2011 – After the U.S. Supreme Court struck down speaker- and content-based restrictions in Sorrell v. IMS Health, legal experts, drug manufacturers and other industry interest groups are testing the waters to determine whether that opinion leaves the door open for new challenges to certain FDA regulations, specifically the agency’s ban on most […]

Read more

Par Pharma Case Asserts That First Amendment Protects Truthful Off-label Speech

Oct. 18, 2011 – A case filed by Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. against the FDA seeks to preserve Par”s First Amendment right to provide truthful information to physicians and other healthcare providers about the off-label use of Par”s prescription drug, Megace® ES, which is approved for the treatment of anorexia, cachexia, or an unexplained significant weight […]

Read more

Experts Weigh In on Implications of Sorrell Decision

Aug. 1, 2011 — The recent Supreme Court decision in Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. is earning robust commentary in the legal community because it extends greater First Amendment protection for marketing and expands that protection to data mining and use. In addition, many legal scholars openly are questioning whether the FDA can continue its […]

Read more

From The RPM Report: Data Mining Case Struck Down by Supreme Court; IMS Prepares for Future Battles

July 27, 2011 — A recent article written by Kate Rawson in The RPM Report provides an excellent summary of the Supreme Court”s decision in Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. and discusses the decision”s implications for the pharmaceutical industry. Coalition for Healthcare Communication Executive Director John Kamp is quoted in this insightful article, which is reprinted below, with permission.   […]

Read more

Sorrell v. IMS: What Marketing Professionals Need to Know

By John Kamp, Executive Director, Coalition for Healthcare Communication July 18, 2011 — For those who have not read the entire June 23 Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. Supreme Court decision (No. 10-779), here is a quick summary of what happened and what drug marketing executives need to know. Top line, the Supreme Court majority […]

Read more