Tag: off-label litigation

off-label litigation

Regulatory/FDA

OPDP’s Abrams: Enforcement Still a Priority, Despite Decrease in Letters

OPDP’s Abrams: Enforcement Still a Priority, Despite Decrease in Letters

Oct. 3, 2016 – Although the FDA’s Office of Prescription Drug Promotion (OPDP) has issued just four enforcement letters in 2016, it remains focused on enforcement through other means, such as issuing guidance documents, and reviewing draft product labeling and launch materials to promote voluntary compliance, according to OPDP Director Tom Abrams. Abrams, who spoke […]

Read more

Courts/First Amendment

Courts’ Support for “Truthful and Non-misleading” Speech Has Not Yet Resulted in FDA Policy Change

Courts’ Support for “Truthful and Non-misleading” Speech Has Not Yet Resulted in FDA Policy Change

May 31, 2016 – Although the U.S. Supreme Court and other courts consistently are deciding cases in favor of First Amendment protections for commercial speech – including speech about off-label uses – the movement toward a “truthful and non-misleading” standard has not moved the needle on this issue at the FDA, according to Alan Bennett, […]

Read more

Jury Says “Not Guilty” to Off-label Charges in Medical Device Case

March 3, 2016 – As the FDA fails to update or further clarify its policy regarding off-label promotion, the courts continue to hear cases that are being decided in favor of allowing.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth has entered an order dismissing the case; it is not subject to appeal. companies to share truthful and non-misleading […]

Read more

Which Standard of Truth Will Be Used To Evaluate Non-misleading Ad Claims?

Oct. 5, 2015 – Following numerous First Amendment court cases about promotional speech decided in favor of pharmaceutical companies, it appears that the FDA may have to begin accepting alternative evidence to support truthful and non-misleading promotional claims, according to Douglas Hallward-Driemeier, partner, Appellate and Supreme Court Practice, Ropes & Gray. As demonstrated by the […]

Read more

Pacira Files Complaint Calling FDA Marketing Restrictions Unconstitutional

Sept. 10, 2015 – On the heels of last month’s ruling in Amarin v. FDA, which held that the FDA cannot prohibit companies from communicating truthful and non-misleading speech about the off-label uses of their products, a second lawsuit calling the FDA’s marketing enforcement practices into question has been filed in the U.S. District Court […]

Read more

Amarin Federal Court Decision: FDA Off-Label Marketing Rules Violate the First Amendment By John Kamp

Aug. 10, 2015 – Late last week the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York granted Amarin Pharma Inc.’s request for an injunction to stop the FDA from enforcing rules that prohibit companies from communicating to physicians truthful and non-misleading information about the off-label uses of their products. Below, Coalition for Healthcare […]

Read more

FDA Plans for Off-label Communication Draft Guidance, Meeting

May 11, 2015 – With off-label provisions in the 21st Century Cures legislation in the works and the courts bearing down on the FDA regarding First Amendment protection of industry’s truthful, non-misleading speech about off-label uses of approved products, it appears that a bridge between the agency’s long-held positions and industry’s desire to speak to […]

Read more

In Amicus Brief, PhRMA Says Off-label Case “Raises Serious First Amendment Concerns”

Sept. 19, 2014 – Stating that a whistleblower’s interpretation of the False Claims Act has “a critical flaw” because it “threaten[s] core First Amendment rights,” an amicus curiae brief filed by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) asks the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California to dismiss the case. PhRMA […]

Read more