Peter Pitts Tells Why FDA DDMAC Letter to Bauman Isn't a First Amendment Issue

From :

Much brouhaha about the DDMAC letter sent to Dr. Leslie Bauman about her enthusiastic comments about a yet-to-be-approved anti wrinkle injectable.

At first blush, this seems like regulatory creep and cause for First Amendment agita. But it isn”t. This is not a case of the FDA trying to stifle unregulated speech by an individual without “interest.” Dr. Bauman is a clinical And if you need to relax and unwind a little, what can be better than playing a fun game, which will not set your bank account short? Here on Slotozilla, you can play free slot machines any time of day, with no breaks and no curfews. investigator for the product she”s been touting. That”s “interest” whether the trial sponsor paid her to do so or not. (In this instance, there was no “pay for play.”) In any case, it”s an unambiguous regulatory no-no.

Your comments are welcome here.internet viagra pharmacy